Translate

Showing posts with label Sports Psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sports Psychology. Show all posts

Monday, 2 September 2019

Psychology of an Athlete


 The training and preparing the psychology of an athlete is equally as important as the physical training for the physiological side of the athlete.

Each of these factors supports the other, for example - if an athlete was physically superior to his/her competitors, but was so nervous when competing that he/she could not perform if the pressure overwhelms them. If an athlete was mentally very strong,  he/she can cope with the pressures of a competition but not be able to win because they lacked physical fitness/strength.    

Psychology is defined as “Psychology is the scientific study of human and animal behavior with the object of understanding why living beings behave as they do”. This was sourced from http://www.mindfocus.net/nc00100.html.

To be more specific in a sporting context sports psychology is defined as “the study of the psychological and mental factors that influence and are influenced by participation and performance in sport, exercise, and physical activity, and the application of the knowledge gained through this study to everyday settings”. This was researched from http://www.livestrong.com/article/134188-definition-sport-psychology/#ixzz2Dbt2aWJE 

The psychology of any athlete can vary and this can affect with how they are motivated and this in turn can affect their training and how they perform in competition.

Short Term Psychology Preparation:

Bandura developed the principle of self efficacy which is defined as the self confidence of an athlete/individual in a specific situation. This was sourced from the Edexcel PE Textbook.

 There are four factors that influence an athletes self efficacy which then affects their performance. These are Performance Accomplishments, Vicarious Experience, Social Persuasion and Physiological and Emotional States. Image was sourced from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/staples1.gif
Performers Accomplishments
I recall past experiences from training and competing to keep me motivated and focused. This makes me want to replicate these moments but performing them at bigger/higher level of competitions. One of these is getting three personal bests at the Irish Championships for Powerlifting.
Vicarious Experiences
I researched my sport by watching other Powerlifters train on the television so I can learn from what they are doing. This ranges from monitoring their technique to what sort of training they are doing to improve their performance.
Social Persuasion
Self reflection and I get advice from my coach and other Powerlifters which helps to improve my technique, training or nutrition. They give me advice on how to prepare for a competition and what to do during it, for example what weight I should start at for my opening lift.
Physiological and Emotional States
When I am training and competing I deliberately focus on not becoming anxious and  I remain calm as possible. I just listen to music and I think on the task at hand so I am not losing focus or worrying about what is everyone else doing.
Powerlifting is very much using the Drive Theory which was created by Zajonc (1965). The more aroused you are, the better your performance should be. This theory fails to take into account the individual’s personality and their performance. Powerlifting requires a high arousal level when compared to other sports such as tennis.  Image was obtained from http://www.teachpe.com/images/psychology/drive_theory.jpg



However, another theory is more effective to use. This is the Inverted-U Hypothesis which was created by Yearkes and Dodson (1908). Image was sourced from http://www.teachpe.com/images/psychology/drive_theory.jpg
To explain it better I am using the images describing the optimal zone as shown below.
 

It needs to be said each individual athlete will have their own individual psychological make up and will react differently to pressure. Each athlete has their own zone of optimum performance. These zones will be influenced by their sport. Some athletes are more introverts and others extroverts which again affects their performance in a particular sport.

Hanin describes it well with the ZOF with three different athletes.



A poor performance will occur if arousal levels are either too low, or too high. To produce the best performances the arousal level has to be in between high and low. This is the “zone of optimal functioning” where maximum performance occurs.
When there is a complete loss in performance due to being too over aroused. This is known as choking and it is defined as “the inability to perform to an athlete’s optimum performance – sudden impairment of failure of sports performance due to anxiety”.  This was taken from the Edexcel PE Textbook.
The theory for this complete loss in performance is called the Catastrophe Model created by Hardy (1996). This theory is linked with both the Inverted-U Hypothesis and the Drive Theory.
Anxiety is defined as a natural reaction to threat in the environment (this was taken from the Edexcel PE Textbook) – part of our preparation for flight or fight. There are 3 dimensions for anxiety which are:


Cognitive Anxiety
Worry and negative feelings about your own performance
Somatic Anxiety
Physiological symptoms such as raised heart rate, increased perspiration, shortness of breath.

Behavioural Anxiety
Experiencing tension, agitation and restlessness.

Sports performers can suffer from two types of anxiety linked to performance, these are state and trait anxiety.

State Anxiety
This is situation specific and can be linked to a particular role such as taking a penalty kick in football.

Trait Anxiety
This is a general and enduring feeling of apprehension. When I am competing in a Powerlifting competition I am not thinking about what others are lifting or what their score is. I am focusing about my own performance and what goals I have set myself for example, to attain new personal bests. I use relaxation techniques such as listening to music to prepare me for each competition.
I turn up my music really loud so it drowns out all outside noise so the only thing I can hear is my music and my own thoughts. As I am listening to the music, I am thinking through each individual step to lifting the weight. This includes how I approach the bar, where my feet should be, where my grip should be etc. Even though I know how to do all of this, it keeps me focused and prevents me from getting distracted.
When I go to train or compete I am motivated to win. This motivation comes from within me (this is known as intrinsic motivation). I want to improve my own performance and make the national team - that is my motivation. Other athletes are motivated by tangible rewards such as prize money. This is known as external motivation. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/australianopen/9582630/Record-19.3m-prize-fund-allays-Australian-Open-boycott-fears-as-Andy-Murray-returns-to-action-at-Japan-Open.html
Long Term Psychological Preparation:

When planning my training to improve my physical performance have to also look at improving my psychological performance as well. I have used the SMARTER principle to help plan my goals. The principle is defined as:
   S.M.A.R.T.E.R Principle

The S.M.A.R.T.E.R stands for, Specific, Measurable, Agreed, Realistic, Time-Bound, Exciting and Recorded.

Specific; Its goals are specific to the Sport and are challenging to improve performances. In my Development Plan, the training is tough and specific to Powerlifting but will help me achieve my goals.

Measurable; Its concerned with the performer must be prepared to evaluate their progress critically and adjust their goals as necessary. E.g. Maybe after retesting myself I find I am already achieving a goal, I need to reassess my goals again so I am not peaking to early.

Agreed; Goals set should be discussed with others such as your coach. This will help you set realistic goals and achieve them within a set time frame. I sat down with my coach and was designed this programme around me to help develop my muscular strength for Powerlifting.

Realistic; Goals are sensible and can be achieved by the performer. If a coach was to set the target for a 100m sprinter to break the world record when the sprinter is only 15 years of age, it is a pretty unrealistic target. The goals set by the coach and the performer should reflect the performer’s ability. The goals my coach has set me are all doable within the Development Plan.

Time-Bound; All of the goals of any athletes programme should be divided into short and long term goals. These goals should get progressively harder over the programme to challenge the performer.

Exciting; The goals set need to motivate the performer so he/she wants to keep improving their performance. If the training is not exciting the performer will become bored and not want to train.

 Recorded; By recording down what I do within the Development Plan I will be able to see my progressive from day 1 to day 216. I will be able to work out percentage improvements for all the exercises and see how much I have improved for my three lifts within Powerlifting.


With the SMARTER principle and my Periodisation I have divided my goals up, these are: -

-          Outcome goal: are concerned with the end product e.g. getting onto the Ireland team for Powerlifting.
-          Performance goals: relate to the achievement of a performance e.g. getting a personal best lift in the Bench Press.
-          Process goals: are centred on the technical elements that underpin performance as a focus for development. E.g. a weak grip caused a foul in the deadlift, this needs to be addressed and fixed so it does not occur again.
-          Short Term goals: the building blocks that need to be achieved consistently leading to the successful realisation of long term goal/goals.
-          Long Term goals: have a larger objective and only can happen once short term goals have all been completed.

To further enhance my performance I am using the Profile Cycle. The cycle is made up of 4 stages:-

-          Stage 1: Introduction- learn the importance of the programme to you, undertake an honest appraisal, and agree a commitment.

-          Stage 2: Construction- construct a performance profile, and undertake a series of strategies to enhance your desired/optimum profile goals

-          Stage 3: Implementation- make the psychological skills training programme an automatic daily routine and apply it to actual competitive environments

-          Stage 4: Assessment- review and reconstruct your profile.

Below is an example of a Performance Profile.

1/ Set Goals and set areas for Psychological Skills training
2/ achieve optimal motivation
3/ develop decision making
4/ understand the attribution process
5/ evaluate and review
6/ begin performance profiling





Andrew Richardson, Founder of Strength is Never a Weakness Blog





















I have a BSc (Hons) in Applied Sport Science and a Merit in my MSc in Sport and Exercise Science and I passed my PGCE at Teesside University. 
Now I will be commencing my PhD into "Investigating Sedentary Lifestyles of the Tees Valley" this October 2019. 

I am employed by Teesside University Sport and WellBeing Department as a PT/Fitness Instructor.  


My long term goal is to become a Sport Science and/or Sport and Exercise Lecturer. I am also keen to contribute to academia via continued research in a quest for new knowledge.


My most recent publications: 


My passion is for Sport Science which has led to additional interests incorporating Sports Psychology, Body Dysmorphia, AAS, Doping and Strength and Conditioning. 
Within these respective fields, I have a passion for Strength Training, Fitness Testing, Periodisation and Tapering. 
I write for numerous websites across the UK and Ireland including my own blog Strength is Never a Weakness. 
























I had my own business for providing training plans for teams and athletes. 
I was one of the Irish National Coaches for Powerlifting, and have attained two 3rd places at the first World University Championships, 
in Belarus in July 2016.Feel free to email me or call me as I am always looking for the next challenge. 



Contact details below; 

Facebook: Andrew Richardson (search for)

Facebook Page: @StrengthisNeveraWeakness

Twitter: @arichie17 

Instagram: @arichiepowerlifting

Snapchat: @andypowerlifter 

Email: a.s.richardson@tees.ac.uk

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-richardson-b0039278 



Friday, 24 May 2019

Defining Arousal and Anxiety



Hello Everyone!


I hope all is well


Another new post on the blog, this time it is on arousal and anexiety. This is a poster presentation converted into a blog post.

The poster was co - produced by myself, Connaugh Pearce and Callum Wilksinson. It was part of our first year foundation psychology module on the Applied Sport Science course.


Hope you enjoy reading it


Like, share and comment!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for 'fair use' for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use**



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Abstract

This poster presentation attempts to explain how anxiety and arousal affects sports performance. 


It looks at models such as reversal theory, catastrophe theory, and the employing of the CSAI-2 test (competitive state anxiety inventory) in giving a better understanding of mood states (paratelic, telic) on performance, and the state of mind risk athletes and non-risk athletes are in. From each of the three studies investigated, male and female participants were used along with amateur and elite standard athletes. 


Athletes found that performers in a paratelic state performed much better than those in the telic state when testing their maximum strength. It was also found that there was a negative relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance in athletes, but a positive relationship between self-confidence and performance. 


From this analysis the moderator variables for the cognitive anxiety performance relationship were sex and standard of competition. To conclude, from the studies shown, all of the theories confirmed that arousal and anxiety have a major impact on sports performance.



Introduction

The aim of this poster presentation is to explain the relationship between arousal and anxiety on sports performance, and study the positive or negative emotional states on performance.

Arousal can be defined as, a general physiological and psychological activation, varying on a continuum from deep sleep to intense excitement (Gould, Weinberg, 2011, p.78). Arousal is viewed as a mixture of psychological and physiological activity in a person, and can be viewed as a positive aspect of stress. The amount of arousal experienced by a person can be a motivator to change, whether this is a performance increase or improved learning of a task. However, too much or too little of arousal can work against the performer, therefore it is crucial to reach a mid-point so there is an optimal level achieved.  


Anxiety is viewed as a negative emotional state in which feelings of nervousness, worry, and apprehension are associated with activation or high levels of arousal in the body (Gould, Weinberg, 2011). There are different forms of anxiety; trait anxiety is where the person experiences worry and a feeling of nervousness in different situations. These high levels of anxiety experienced by the person are due to their personality. 


On the other hand, state anxiety is felt in response to a specific situation; it is anxiety related to a specific mood state (Richard, C, 2002). These two levels of anxiety are linked, as a person with high levels of trait anxiety will also experience high levels of state anxiety. The relevance of these areas of study to athletes is extremely important in enhancing their sporting performance, as it aims to illuminate the relation between anxiety and arousal. This relationship, if fully understood, can help athletes to psych up and perform better, rather than psyching out and performing poorly (Gould, Weinberg, 2011).

During this presentation the area being explored will be how arousal can function to the advantage of one person, but on the other hand have a detrimental effect to another. Also, what effects do the fluctuations in anxiety levels, within a person, have on sporting performance?

 
Article: Arousal seeking in sports participants

Paratelic and Telic dominance was the key assessor in this study. The article seeks out to find what state of mind risk athletes and non-risk athletes are in, Paratelic or telic state of dominance. This would determine in the end which of the two types of athletes are arousal seekers or arousal avoiders also. They used the TDS (Telic dominance scale) to conduct and analyse their results which is a 42 item scale comprised of 3 subscales, Seriousmindness, planning orientation and arousal avoidance. 


Three studies were conducted, the first was 102 Australian Males split into 3 groups, 2 groups doing High-Risk Sport and the remaining group doing a Low-Risk sport, the second study consisted of 56 Dutch Males, again split into 3 groups, 2 HR activity and the remaining LR activity. The final study was one where sporting glider pilots and a controlled group of non-sporting members were used, it was trying to find out how arousal differs in age. The hypothesis was based on the theory named ‘Reversal Theory’. 



Article: The Effects of Elevated Arousal and Mood on Maximal Strength Performance in Athletes

The study was looking at the reversal theory research to see if high arousal levels contribute to inhibited athletic performance. They used 22 male and 6 female elite level athletes and divided them into paratelic (non-goal directed and processed focused) and telic groups (goal directed) each subjected to scripts of these states. Each group whilst listening to their script will perform a max hand grip test. Guided imagery techniques where sued to change physiological and psychological arousal levels. 


Results showed significant increases in strength when in the paratelic state (high positive arousal) compared to the telic state. Heart rate and other indicators of parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system were not found to mediate between psychological arousal and performance. They used the following tests, Telic State Measure, Visual Analogue Scale, Tension and Effort Stress Inventory and the Motivational Style Profile Questionnaire.



Article: The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: a meta-analysis

During this study the meta analysis investigated two relationships in competitive sport: 1) state cognitive anxiety with performance and 2) state self-confidence with performance. This relationship has been investigated in much detail over a number of years, with researchers attempting to clarify this with several models and theories. The study used both male and female participants and standard of competition they performed at, which gave significant moderating variables for the relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance.


The studies were conducted through the use of the CSAI-2 (competitive state anxiety inventory) which is the most effective questionnaire for researching the relationship between cognitive anxiety, self-confidence and sport performance. Of the 43 studies reporting a relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance, 60% reported a negative relationship and 23% reported a positive relationship. The same 43 studies also reported a relationship between self-confidence and performance, where 76% reported a positive relationship and 10% reported a negative relationship.



Results

The results taken from all three studies in this article were based on findings and scores taken from the TDS, (Telic Dominance Scale). From Study 1 results found that from three of the sports studied, two of them (Surfing & Sailboarding) had a close relationship, maintaining a fairly low score of 12.28 and 12.61, while the other in question (Weight Lifting) had a much higher overall score of Mean 15.68.

From Study 2, subscales were brought into action where they found that planning orientation and serious-minded had no significant difference from the three groups tested. Although from the arousal-avoidance subscale, they found much lower scores from what they believe to be the ‘high-risk’ sports than those of the marathon runners. This in turn strongly influenced the overall score for telic dominance, where the marathon runners scored higher once again than the risk sport performers.

From Study 3, glider pilots and a control group of non-sporting participants were tested. Similar results from study 2 were found in this study where planning orientation and serious-minded subscales had no significant differences in order to draw to a final conclusion. Although once again to back-up Study 2, the glider pilots scored considerably lower on arousal avoidance than the control group.

The study “The Effects of Elevated Arousal and Mood on Maximal Strength Performance in Athletes” based its hypothesis on the Reversal Theory. 28 elite athletes in the experimental group and 28 volunteers in the control group. The athletes showed greatest handgrip strength performance following the paratelic induction. This supports the study’s original hypothesis as well as previous reversal theory research. Two of the three remaining hypotheses based on reversal research were also supported. 


Participants experienced greater levels of anxiety during the telic induction and greater levels of excitement during the paratelic induction. Elite level athletes where more telic dominant than controls was as expected and replicates research (Kerr 1987). Strength was superior when in paratelic state but strength never improved during study.  High felt arousal and high hedonic tone was critical for best strength performance.





From the results conducted in the Woodman and Hardy (2003) study, it reported a relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance. 26 of the 43 studies reported a negative relationship, 7 reported non-significant results and 10 reported a positive relationship.  Of the studies reporting a relationship between self-confidence and performance, 32 reported a positive relationship, 6 reported non-significant results and 4 reported a negative relationship. The cognitive anxiety and self-confidence mean effect sizes were greater for high standard athletes in comparison to low standard athletes. The possible reason for this being that high standard level of performance is typically associated with increased pressure.


Discussion


From the results of the study ‘The Effects of Elevated Arousal and Mood on Maximal Strength Performance in Athletes’ has found it is clear that arousal can either have a positive or negative effect on an athlete’s performance. The study showed that being in two different states of arousal can affect their sporting performance (max strength test on a handgrip). Athletes need to be in a positive frame of mind to promote better performance; this frame of mind has to be a high paratelic state of arousal. Reversal theory is linked heavily between two of three studies mentioned above and is shown to have a great influence on an athlete’s arousal and anxiety levels.


The relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance and also state self-confidence in relation to performance has been investigated in much detail over a number of years. Researchers have attempted to clarify this with several models and theories. The meta-analysis, conducted by Woodman and Hardy, aimed to examine the fundamental predictions of multidimensional anxiety theory, investigating if cognitive anxiety has a negative relationship with performance and that self-confidence has a positive relationship with performance. The study used both male and female participants and standard of competition they performed at, which gave significant moderating variables for the relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance.  


This meta-analysis has revealed that both cognitive anxiety and self-confidence are significantly related to competitive sport performance. It has also revealed that the mean effect sizes for cognitive anxiety and self-confidence were significantly higher for men than for women, which was also true for high standard athletes compared to low standard. The possible reason for this being that high standard level of performance is typically associated with increased pressure.  It was also found that high standard athletes operate within a more controlled personal environment in comparison to amateur competitors- this is to say that athletes of a high level are more likely to be in ‘control’. From these findings, it is reasonable to expect that the effect of self-confidence and cognitive anxiety upon performance will be clearer with elite athletes.


There is still much research to be conducted in the Woodman and Hardy study, with the most responsive and controlled theoretical models being the processing efficiency theory, which is based on the relationship between performance effectiveness on the one hand and the amount of effort or resources used to attain that level of performance on the other hand (Derekshan, Eysenck, 2009). And also the catastrophe model, which attempts to predict human behaviour and performance rather than attempting to explain how it occurs.


From each of the three studies studied in Arousal Seeking in Risk Sport Participants there were trends in all three where Telic dominance was noticeably linked with what was categorised as the Low-Risk sports evaluated in each study. Also the Paratelic dominance was noticeably linked with the High Risk Sport evaluated such as Parachuting and Motor-Racing. From these results we could come to a conclusion that High risk sports would lean more towards the Paratelic Dominance which in turn would mean that the participants would be more inclined to participate in arousal seeking activity, whereas the Low Risk sport participants would be more inclined to participate in arousal avoiding situations/activity. Performance will change in different activities and situations, especially in high risk and low risk activity due to the arousal levels. As mentioned above arousal can have a positive or negative effect of sporting performance, this all depends on the type of sport or activity being performed. Low arousal may help improve concentration, as it was found in the weight lifting in study 1, also arousal may improve motivation which could be helpful to a parachutist.


To avoid elevated levels of anxiety an optimal arousal or inverted U approach would emphasize reducing anxiety by reducing or controlling arousal. Results in this experiment ‘The Effects of Elevated Arousal and Mood on Maximal Strength Performance in Athletes’ suggest that if athletic task involves more explosive type maximal strength effort a decrease in arousal may inhibit performance. Therefore an approach based on reversal theory principles would be to train athletes to switch or reverse to a paratelic motivational state. This would avoid the need to reduce anxiety by lowering arousal, as lowering arousal may also affect performance negatively.


To summarise the material gathered we can conclude that arousal and anxiety play a crucial part in an athlete’s sporting performance. Judging by the material looking at Telic/Paratelic states and cognitive and state anxiety. The optimal combination of emotions needed for best performance will not necessarily occur at the midpoint of the arousal-state continuum and performance depends on the level of cognitive state anxiety a performer exhibits. (Gould, Weinberg, 2011, p99)




References

Kerr, J. H. (1991). ‘Arousal-seeking in risk sport participants’. Journal of applied sport psychology. 12 (6) 613-616
Perkins, D, Wilson, G.V, Kerr, J. H (2001). ‘The effects of elevated arousal and mood on maximal strength performance in athletes’. Journal of applied sport psychology. 13 (3) 239-259
Cox, H. Richard. (2002). Sport Psychology: Concepts and Applications. 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies
Weinberg, R.S, Gould, D. (2007). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. 4th edn. Leeds: Human Kinetics
Woodman, T, Hardy, L. (2003). ‘The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: a meta-analysis’. Journal of sports sciences. 21: 443-457










Andrew Richardson, Founder of Strength is Never a Weakness Blog





















I have a BSc (Hons) in Applied Sport Science and a Merit in my MSc in Sport and Exercise Science and I passed my PGCE at Teesside University. 
Now I will be commencing my PhD into "Investigating Sedentary Lifestyles of the Tees Valley" this October 2019. 

I am employed by Teesside University Sport and WellBeing Department as a PT/Fitness Instructor.  


My long term goal is to become a Sport Science and/or Sport and Exercise Lecturer. I am also keen to contribute to academia via continued research in a quest for new knowledge.


My most recent publications: 


My passion is for Sport Science which has led to additional interests incorporating Sports Psychology, Body Dysmorphia, AAS, Doping and Strength and Conditioning. 
Within these respective fields, I have a passion for Strength Training, Fitness Testing, Periodisation and Tapering. 
I write for numerous websites across the UK and Ireland including my own blog Strength is Never a Weakness. 
























I had my own business for providing training plans for teams and athletes. 
I was one of the Irish National Coaches for Powerlifting, and have attained two 3rd places at the first World University Championships, 
in Belarus in July 2016.Feel free to email me or call me as I am always looking for the next challenge. 



Contact details below; 

Facebook: Andrew Richardson (search for)

Facebook Page: @StrengthisNeveraWeakness

Twitter: @arichie17 

Instagram: @arichiepowerlifting

Snapchat: @andypowerlifter 

Email: a.s.richardson@tees.ac.uk

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-richardson-b0039278