Translate

Friday 23 June 2017

A Review of an Androgenic Anabolic Steroid (AAS) Meta – Analysis Paper 1985-2015

This article is a condensed version of a university assignment I submitted (as part of one of my assessments last semester) on Androgenic Anabolic Steroid Usage.

*Disclaimer*

This is not an attempt to bash or throw a dig at someone who uses AAS. This is just a review of  a meta analysis, which I am hoping to inform and educate my readers with this blog post.

Just because this is a meta analysis, it does not mean we should take its word for it. We should be critical of how it was made, the potential bias of the researcher(s), and the level of rigor for the methodology (validity and reliability).

Remember I am discussing this in the context of recreational usage of AAS, not in the context of competitive sports (they are two entirely different topics of discussion) and as a competitive athlete and member of UK Anti-Doping I am not in favor of using AAS in a tested sporting environment to gain an unfair and non sportsmanship advantage over one's opponent.

Enjoy reading!

Methodology of Literature Review
A literature search was carried out on Sports Discus, Google Scholar and Science Direct with 
using keywords “AAS”, “Anabolic Steroids”, “Muscle Dysmorphia”, “Body Image”, and “Anabolic 
Steroids Meta-Analysis”. Through analyzing the literature search, the Meta-Analysis entitled 
“The global epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: a meta-analysis and meta-regression 
analysis” (2014) was found. 

Sagoe, D., Molde, H., Andreassen, C.S., Torsheim, T. and Pallesen, S., 2014. 
The global epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: a meta-analysis 
and meta-regression analysis. Annals of epidemiology, 24(5), pp.383-398.

This reviewed 271 papers and was deemed a suitable reference for
analyzing AAS trends over time. To do this, in Appendix 1 the adapted Data Inclusion and 
Exclusion Criteria was imposed upon the 271 Journals, 61 of which met the criteria. These papers 
were across the following two defined time periods;

1.    1985 – 1999
2.    2000 – 2015

The reason for the two time periods is to compare usage at the turn of the century and then review a 
new generation of “AAS users” - 15 years later which may highlight new trends. In addition, the 
introduction of certain external factors has made getting AAS easier in the 21st Century. These 
time periods are also cross-referenced geographically as follows:

1.    United Kingdom
2.    North America
3.    Rest of World


This is for comparison within each region as different countries have dissimilar laws on accessibility 
for AAS.  E.g. in the UK it is easier to obtain AAS than in America (Kokkevi, et al, 2008). 
Furthermore, data between each geographical area and can be found in Appendices 2 and 3 which 
formulated the Flow – Chart 1.0 and 2.0 below.  








How has there been such an increase in AAS usage over the last 15 years compared to 
1985-1999? There is no one simple answer as there are plenty of contributing multi factorial issues.

If I was to pick three; 

•    Internet Access: This has to lead to an increase of buying steroids and the most popular place 
for internet users is off black market sites and the dark web (DuRant et al., 1993: 923).

•    Influence of Social Media: The encouragement of the steroid user has been negatively 
influenced by unrealistic images and beliefs circulated on social media. These have massive cult 
followings (Instagram) behind them due to their lavish, appealing and large than life lifestyles,
thus encouraging those with already frail perceptions of their masculinity to follow them. 
(Field et al, 2005). Again with reference to symbolic violence. 

•    Job Roles: Police, army, fire service, private security, construction, etc use steroids for their 
physical jobs, but there is an increase in other professions such as doctors, coaches and teachers to 
use AAS to look and feel powerful and authoritative when dealing with clients or patients 
(Kimmel and Mahalik, 2004; Magnolia Pictures & Magnet Releasing, 2008). 

Future Research Recommendations and Summary

In order to raise awareness and to help those suffering with BI, MD or perhaps an addiction to AAS, 
the Image and Performance Enhancing Drugs (IPEDs) publish literature reviews and steroid 
awareness guides within the UK to educate and inform users or potential users as part of the 
Lifeline Project (Lifeline, 2017).  Another example of a successful scheme is Drugs in 
Sport Clinic and User Support (DISCUS) in Durham (Frank, 2016). It ran for fifteen years educating 
the public on how to train, eat correctly, use AAS safely and the potential negative side effects of 
using AAS, but its funding was cut. This is an issue when one of the local towns (Middlesbrough) 
which was named the UK capital for steroid usage (GazetteLive, 2016).

Across the pond, the Adolescents Training and Learning to Avoid Steroids (ATLAS) study in 
America (1996) was created to reduce the increase in steroid usage at school level. At the end of 
the program, students reported better understanding of the effects (positive and negative) and 
also encouraged better lifestyle (diet and training) habits (Goldberg et al, 1996). Regrettably, a 
year after the ATLAS program, the American Paediatrician Association stated “to our knowledge,
no study has identified an adolescent population without the temptation and risks of anabolic steroid
 use. Furthermore, no study has been published showing a decrease in the prevalence of anabolic
steroid use over time” (Miller et al 2002). This can be evidenced with the data shown in Flow - 
Chart 1.0 and 2.0.

What is required is a data analysis on a large scale to determine behavioral tendencies of the 21st 
century AAS user. The government needs to recognize this matter and its ultimate effect it will have 
on the NHS if unchecked. That way, new intervention programmes can be put into immediate effect 
at hospitals and drug/alcohol clinics. This should minimize any increase in ujnderground AAS usage,
eventually reducing it over time whilst decreasing MD and related issues. However, this is easier said
than done as getting access to this data requires having trust within the gym and fitness sub-cultures 
to open up about the stigma that surrounds MD and AAS usage and acquisition.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Data Collection Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria to formulate argument:
61 studies were included in this review. Inclusion of these studies was due to them meeting the 
following;
I)                   Male and female included in data collection within respective journals.
II)                N sample size value shown (showing both male and female breakdown).
III)              % breakdown of AAS used by males and females.
IV)             Paper had to contain either one or more of the following keywords; High School/School/
Adolescents/Gym/General/Prison/Ex Prisoner/Prisoner/Drug User/Athlete/Athletics/NFL/Sports.
V)                Studies must be within 1985 – 2015.
VI)             Studies must show survey response rates.
210 Studies were excluded from the data analysis if they did not meet the following;
I)                   Studies did not show AAS prevalence rates
II)                Studies did not show survey response rates
III)              Studies did not show any gender breakdown of sample population
IV)             Studies did not show sample sizes





Appendix 2.0 Limitations of the Literature and Data
Within any study or methodology there are some limitations to the data collection which are 
identified as follows: regarding questionnaires, it is to be assumed people can lie and that they are 
limited to what they can answer (Beiske, 2002) due to the questions that are set. Each studies’ 
questions will be different to some degree bar a few standardised statements requiring answers. 
The can be duplicated if subjects are used more than once, however this is unknown as 
participants’ are left out in accordance with the Data Protection Act (Act, 1998). There is 
more research being done in the 21st Century on AAS than in previous years. 
This can be shown in the papers 

This is due to the popularity of AAS being used and studied at an academic level. Regrettably 
this places bias and an unfavorable slant to presenting any case.  The data gathered is from 
multiple populations so one cannot assume that all AAS users are all athletes, teenagers, males or 
females etc. The main purpose was to identify the difference in usage over time. Considering 
some of the studies, a few had very poor replies to their questionnaires whereas others were 
excellent. These ranged from a 2.7% response to up to 100%.

This no doubt effects the reliability of the study. Adding to that, some studies had very small 
sample sizes thus also presenting potentially unrealistic or misleading data (Beiske, 2002). A 
significant majority of the studies analysed did not meet the criteria. If they did, the data may 
have changed significantly (in favour of an increase usage of AAS). Finally, as previously 
mentioned, different countries have different laws on steroid availability and accessibility 
(Anabolics.com Advanced Science of Muscle Building, 2017 and Sted-Ed Steroid Education, 
2017) which may also affect recruitment numbers for data collection.

To see the breakdown of the papers and the stats they are at the bottom of the page. There is a 
big break in the text as the tables extend across the page. Do allow the table to be fully seen 
we have had to knock them way down so no adverts down the side will interfere with 
them. Apologies for this presentation error bu eblogger does not support formatting tables.














Once both my final Master projects are completed I will write them up on this as it goes 
more into detail into AAS culture, gym culture, negatives of social media. 





































Appendix 3 Table 2.0 Data of all AAS and Non AAS users across 21 Studies over a 15 year period.
1985 - 1999 Timeline of AAS Studies
Geographical area of Investigation
Studies
 AAS Usage %
(Combined) 
Male AAS Usage %
Female AAS Usage %
Sample (N) Size (Combined)
Sample Size Male
Sample Size Female
Sample Size of AAS Users (Combined)
Sample Size of Males who use AAS
Sample Size of Females who use AAS
Study Response Rate %
United Kingdom
4
3.50
3.90
1.80
3576
2870
706
125
112
13
59.50
North America
11
2.80
3.50
2.00
34321
15529
15792
973
650
323
75.20
Rest of World
6
5.88
5.28
1.20
17188
9285
8503
487
386
101
81.50
Combined
21
2.88
4.15
1.77
55085
27684
25001
1585
1148
437
72.00










 Appendix 4 Table 3.0 Data of all AAS and Non AAS users across 40 Studies over a 15 year period.
2000 - 2015  Timeline of AAS Studies
Geographical area of Investigation
Studies
 AAS Usage %
(Combined)
Male AAS Usage %
Female AAS Usage %
Sample (N) Size (Combined)
Sample Size Male
Sample Size Female
Sample Size of AAS Users (Combined)
Sample Size of Males who use AAS
Sample Size of Females who use AAS
Study Response Rate %
United Kingdom
4
41
41.06
0.00....
1408
1383
25
578
576
2
54.40
North America
8
4.04
4.12
3.97
39910
17,308
22,602
1612
713
899
85.40
Rest of World
28
4.79
5.60
3.73
101233
57996
43237
4859
3248
1611
80.62
Combined
40

4.94
5.91
3.81
142,551
76687
65864
7049
4537
2512
73.47








































Andrew Richardson, Founder of Strength is Never a Weakness Blog





















I have a BSc (Hons) in Applied Sport Science and a Merit in my MSc in Sport and Exercise Science and I passed my PGCE at Teesside University. 
Now I will be commencing my PhD into "Investigating Sedentary Lifestyles of the Tees Valley" this October 2019. 

I am employed by Teesside University Sport and WellBeing Department as a PT/Fitness Instructor.  


My long term goal is to become a Sport Science and/or Sport and Exercise Lecturer. I am also keen to contribute to academia via continued research in a quest for new knowledge.


My most recent publications: 


My passion is for Sport Science which has led to additional interests incorporating Sports Psychology, Body Dysmorphia, AAS, Doping and Strength and Conditioning. 
Within these respective fields, I have a passion for Strength Training, Fitness Testing, Periodisation and Tapering. 
I write for numerous websites across the UK and Ireland including my own blog Strength is Never a Weakness. 
























I had my own business for providing training plans for teams and athletes. 
I was one of the Irish National Coaches for Powerlifting, and have attained two 3rd places at the first World University Championships, 
in Belarus in July 2016.Feel free to email me or call me as I am always looking for the next challenge. 



Contact details below; 

Facebook: Andrew Richardson (search for)

Facebook Page: @StrengthisNeveraWeakness

Twitter: @arichie17 

Instagram: @arichiepowerlifting

Snapchat: @andypowerlifter 

Email: a.s.richardson@tees.ac.uk

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-richardson-b0039278